xt7ghx15n565_225 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dipstest/xt7ghx15n565/data/mets.xml https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dipstest/xt7ghx15n565/data/0000ua001.dao.xml unknown 9.56 Cubic Feet 33 boxes archival material 0000ua001 English University of Kentucky Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center.  Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. James K. Patterson papers Agriculture text Agriculture 2024 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dipstest/xt7ghx15n565/data/0000ua001/Box_23/Folder_6/Multipage25475.pdf undated section false xt7ghx15n565_225 xt7ghx15n565 $1012 (111111992 nf Kenturky,
In. K. gamma", fih. 9.. 1113. R. fireathmt.

ilneingtun. Kg...

 

Station College or Uni— President's DiTBCtOT'S
Income Versity Income Salary Salary

"w m ,,... _. .____ =2 tr~.~;;::m~;..u. -_ ~.:: mtg ,1 :7. . .. 73:214., 2. njeefiurri- :-_,:_uA-»_~.., ,.~_..=.;:a~.m.

 

Indiana 05000. $2250.
Illinois $941,000. 8000. 4000.
Minnesota $200,000. 551,000. 7000. 4000.
Kansas ,65,000. 250,000. 5000. 5000.
Ohio 90,000. 582,000. 5000. 2500.
New York . ‘ 1,446,000. 10000. 4500.
Missouri 471,000. 6000. 5200.

& house

Michigan 28,000. 250,000. . 2200.
& house

_Calif0rnia 950,000.

Iowa 538,000. ‘ W» 4000.

Kentucky 90,000. 2760.
& house

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Co—bperative Work between Stations and the Department of Agriculture.

At the San Francisco meeting of the American Association of Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations, :1 com—
mittee on co-operative work between stations and the Department was appointed. This committee consisted of Directors
IS. A. Bryan, of \Vashington; H. H. Goodell, of Massachusetts; W. A. Henry, of \Viscousiu; H. J. \Vaters, of Missouri,
and L. B. Carpenter, of Colorado. At the New Haven meeting the following report of this committee was adopted by
the association and the committee continued. It is understood that a conference of all directors and the department on
this subject is desired at the coming \Vashington meeting. Meanwhile the committee invites a careful examination
of the report and of the entire question of co—operative work, and requests that you make at once to the chairman, E. A.
Bryan, Pullman, \Vashington, any suggestions which may occur to you on the subject.

Report of the Committee
Your committee on Co-operative \Vork between the Stations and the Department of Agriculture would respectfully submit the follow-
ing report: .
The committee has sought for an expression of views both from directors of experiment stations and from persons connected with the

department. A very general and free expression has been secured, from which it has become evident that the matter is one of great in-
terest and far-reaching importance. The attitude of the present Secretary of;\griculture toward closer co-operation between the depart»
ment and the stations and toward more systematic arrangements for such co-operation. meets with very general approval from the directors
of experiment stations. The perfecting ofa system of co-opcration in all its details will require time, and it is quite beyond the power of
the committee, without further Consideration, to present a definite program. The most it can hope to do is to suggest such general consider-
ations and principles as may, with the approval of the association, serve for future guidance in co-operative experimentation.

The term “co-operation” is a somewhat loose one, suggesting all degrees of mutual helpfulness, from the formation of a "card index“
to station publications on the one hand, to acting as an agent in seed distribution on the other. In the opinion of the committee, however,
the immediate end in view in the appointment of this committee was the establishment of a satisfactory basis for what might be called
“joint experimentation." Many cases in which the work of the department supplements the work of the stations, or W}? E's/1m, cannot be
called “co—operative work" in the above sense. It is not the business of your committee to define the functions of the department. But as
the department would seem to be the only feasible channel through which the stations can ordinarily receive foreign seeds and plants, for
which purpose a corps of expert agents visiting all parts of the world is essential. the securing ofsuch seeds and plants for the stations, to-
gether with any relevant facts as to their propagation, is to be looked upon as a legitimate function of the department and as a service to
the station rather than as ail example of co-operative experimentation. ()n the other hand, when a station consents to test for the depart-
ment certain new seeds and plants in which it is not otherwise particularly interested, it should be looked upon rather as a courtesy exten-
ded to the department than as a case ofjoint experimentation requiring mutual expenditure of funds. Another type of co-operation is that
in which the facilities at the disposal of either institution is not sufficient for the completion of the work without the help of the other.
Such for example would be the case in which tht department furnishes a tobacco expert to Connecticut temporarily, or a case in which it
completes some chemical analyses to which the equipment ofa station might not be quite adequate; or, for instance, on the other hand the
assistance rendered by the Arizona station to the department in the introduction into the I'nited States of the date palm—an experiment of
such magnitude as to be quite beyond the capacity ofa state station and of such importance as to make it a national affair.

A third type ofco-operation is the case in which work of a purely scientific. character, involving large expenditure and a number of
investigators, has been undertaken by the department. In such a case it is not unlikely that men of especial fitness for the investigation
will be found here and there in colleges and experiment stations who do not wish to sever their local connections. In such case their scr-
vicesare to be secured and facilities are to be placed at their disposal as the particular circumstances seem to require, and they are to be
looked upon, in a) far, rather in the light of special agents of the department. Such, for example. are the nutrition investigations of Dr.
Atwater and Dr. Armsby. A fourth type ofco-(qM-ratiou is seen in those investigations which require the combined work of many stations,as
for example, an attempt to obtain definite information on the changes produced in plants by environment aid the value of this factor in
plant breeding; or the study of the varying effect of soil and climate on some single crop, as the potato. Such experiments call for the work
of many stations at the same time. It is manifest that the uniformity and efficiency of the work would require that such co-operation be
arranged and supervised by some central organization, and it is equally manifest that the department is best prepared to undertake the task.

But the most important type of co—operation, so far as the present ctmsidcration is concerned, is perhaps thejoint experimentation ens
gaged in by the department and the individual station. The principles however that apply in this case are applicable very generally in co-
operative work. \'our committee would deem it desirable that both the department and the station should feel entirely free to propose
joint experimentation or to decline a proposal for such work.

It is very clear to the connnittec that the autonomy of the stations should be preserved, and that the stationashould, in no sense, become
extensions of the divisions of the department for purposes ofcxperimental work. Not only is the autonomy of the stations necessary to the
fulfillment of their functions, but autonomy in scientific investigations is essential. \‘our committee would therefore deem it desirable,
where co-operative work seems advisable, that the agreement take the shape ofa formal contract between the station, as such, and the de—
partment, as such, through the properly authorized channels of each. That is that the high contracting parties be the station on the one
hand and the department on the other. Arrangements between individual officers of the two institutions are deemed inadvisable.

The cost of co-operation should be borne jointly by the station and by the department, and the amounts to be expended should, as far
as practicable, be definitely agreed upon and specified.

“'hile it is understood that an absolute guarantee of continuance cannot be given, yet there should be reasonable mutual assurance of
a fixed policy until the completion of the work undertaken.

The results of the investigation should be available to both institutions, priority of publication being a matter for mutual agreement at
the outset. In all cases, publications should set forth that such work is the result ofjoiut experimentation.

Your committee deem it advisable that independent work be not undertaken in the several states by thedepartment without the knowl-

edge of the station or consultation with the station, particularly along lines of investigation in which the state station is engaged.

Whenever co-operation with practical men in the state is desired by the department in investigationsitis suggested that the state station
be the agency through which such co-operation is comlucted. For example, if the department wishes to distribute seeds or plants for CO-
operative work, the knowledge both of men and physical conditions on the part of the station should be made available.

Your committee makes the above suggestions realizing that they are in no wise complete, and that the subject is one requiring further
Inquiry.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
(Szg‘m’d by 1/16 Colin/117166.)

 

 33 LL‘
F—M .

0111' .5'.ate L111a1'd5 need 11150 t1ai1111d young 51111111115 with all the L1111111 of :1
111101':11 111111011 1:1111 and 11111 t11o1ough tr: 1111111g 111' :1 5111111012 1111' 01111-015 who will.
111' 1111111' 111100 of 111.111':11'te1'. 111011' 11111110111- 0. and their 111111 gentlemanly' 1111: 11111115.
1111 01111111011111: to organi7e. geod ('on1panie5. to train them thoroughly. :11111 to
i115pire them with that fine 511irit 111' 1110 511111111' which will make 1110111 1111110
"10'1'05t benefit to the ":t lte.

Few of our 10111111111105 now ':111 5111'111'0 the right kind of 111111'111'5 to t)‘L":llli'/t‘
and keep 111) :11111 train our gna1'd5. “'0 have '15 good 111011 for 51111111115 :15 anv
State or country, but we have very few 11111111111011t 11111101" I .501'ion.51\'
1111111150 any exemption of any 11:15.5 or 01:15515 from the 5trict 1'11111 111' thorough
military training 111 every year of the 1o|lege worse. and 1 do thi5 .5'ol1-lv for
the gm.- d of the vonng 111011 :11111 all who 1 are for them and for the good of the
Sl:1te.1 hope (teneral 11011 :11111 .111 who h:1\e gi\en thi5 matter 11511f11l thought
will help organize the thought and opinion of \'our 1onf010111-0 on tl1i5 511111001
which will lead to the adoption of very 511'onL' 1'05ol11tion5 upon t110 511oi1111t
:11111 organized action to 1:'1\e (‘oanr115'5 11:155 1:51w which will pornlit of no
0.\0mpt1o11 1-.\cept for the young women and the men who :11'0 1111\‘51 1:l|y
incompetent. _

11111125, truly. .\1'1.'1.'5'r1'.5' I". “11.1.5115,
(lor1'l'nol' of l1'1'nlm'l.'I/.

1 have given ”115' matter :1 great deal of thought, :11111 while I fully :1g1ee,
with what General 11011 5aid ve5t01'dav in regard to the 5.1'011gth, hoth of the
defensive attitude of this count1y :11111 11111 111'1'0115'ive, if it 5111111111 :155'111110 that.
role. I have :1 5trong conviction that we will 11150 :1 rare opportunity it we fail
to comply with the 511irit of tl1i5 law of (‘ong1'e55. ’1‘1101'0 is no countrv in the
world 11:11 1111551155115 t110 010111111115 out of which :1 soldier 15 made 111 a higher
degree than the. 1'1111011 State5 111’ .\11101‘ic:1: and while we 11L'L'11py :1 compar-

"a‘tively isolated po5ition and. 511 long :15 we have :1 5trong 110,01, :11'0 not likely
to he :1.5'.5'ailcd from ahrond 5till the 1111.55111ilitv mav 0111110.. 0111' 101111011-
cies :11'0 pacific. hut we 5111111111 he prepared to meet 011101'L'0n1'ie5. To main-
t::’1 an adequate force that would f111'ni5h the 11111111115 for :1 good organization
: 5t:111di11g :11'111v would require not 10.5 5'5 than thr00 or four hundred thon5and

‘1111111 in 11115 conntrv. That would' he :1 vei'v expensive operation. It \1'1111111
in\ol'\"0"f111‘111lilitary expenditure at 10:15t tour 11111115 :15 much :15 'we 1:1'11'0xp1111d~
111g now. If 110 111111 :1 trained militia 111 0very State 111 the I'nion. properly

disciplined :11111 properly organized. called out for military 0x01'1-i5'05 two or
t111'1 1111 1111105 :1 year. and their (1x01111505 continued for 51111101011tly long to give
them knowledge of field practice and of the operation5 of war. you wouldi he

:11110 to meet any 1111101'g11111'y 111 :1 Lon1pa1'ati\01y 511111't time, and with com—

' "atively little 0x11111150. ’l‘here :11'0 111i1itia in training 111 the l'nited 511111-51
now :1111111111t111g to not 1055 than three or tour hundred t'11ou5and 1111111. :111 told.
We have about 5.001) or 10.000 of them 111 Kentucky. 111 State5 like New York
:11111 1'011115ylvania :11111 the 1:1 '1101' State5 they :11'0 0111'1'1151)ondingly more 1111-
111111'11115. But t11115e militia :11'0 1'1111111:11':1t1ve.|y worth11155 111110.55 they he properly
trained and 11111055 the) have the 11110111115 of :111 organization to begin with. and
1111111015 :11110 to 111:111ipulat0 11111111111111 1i'fi’11'1'i'1z0 them :11111 111 mg them into proper
military 511:1pe and trainil g. .521) that they may he made effective at once :1'1'111

'1110111111111'at0d with the 5tanding army of the United State5. From :111 11011111111110
point of view that would he an 111111101150, saving.

The 51110 qua non for :1 good military organization 15 to have good otlic01'5.
:11111 where ':111 vou look for good 11ttice1'5 better than 111 t110 land-grant college5
of 11111 Initod States of Ameri :1. organi7ed partly for that pnrpo5e in accord-
ance with the 51111'it of the organic law. :11111 to which :11'0 detailed by t110 mili-
tary 110pa1't111011t—th11 War Departmont of the [111111111 Status—t110. nece55ary
"olfieer5 to carry on :111 thi5 .5'y5t0n1 of military t':1iniI 1:. whether it he long or
.5'11111't'.1 From :111 economic point of \'i11w we 111111111. 111 0:150 of 011101'ge11cy. 5111-1111
.5'01'01'nl hundreds of 111111111115 of doll:11'5. We can afford to keep :1 small 5ta11d-
111g :11'11:\' if we have :111 01111: tent trained citizen soldiery ready to take the 110111
:11111 to he 1111-1 1"po1:1ted with the. 5ta111ling army of the United Stat05 in :111 emer-
gency. “'0. :11'0 never likely to 1111. .511hjected to :1 conscription here. It 15 :1111111
‘to the thoughts and the feeling.5 and traditions of the Anglo-S axon 5tock. 11111.
while that is :1 fact. and while we are not 11151105011 to 5111111111 to 01111501'1'11111111.
and never will. yet we ought not't'h "it'c’V‘L‘i'ect the fact that we have the very
l'e.5't 1110211011t for fonning'an army :11111 forming it at 511111't' notice. if only the
1101-055 :'11y 111'1101111111111ar1' 1110:15111'05 he taken to prov 1110 t110 110.1'055ary instruc-
‘tion at the proper time.

While we :11'0 :1 peaceful race. we :11'0 not :111 unwarlike people. That 15 to
5:1y. we :11'0 1':(1111v to defend ou1'5elve5. 111' think we are ready to defend our-
.5'011'115. whenever we :11'0-called upon. But we had :1 painful experienee iii
regard to that in the. civil war. It took \veek5'. 11111111115. :11111 y0a1'5 to hring the.
citizen soldiery. of the l'nited Stat05 on the one 11:11111 and t110 t‘onfederate
51:111-5- on 11:11 other hand. into the nece55an' degree of etliciency to make them
1'1'1'111'tiv0. and while that was heing done they died by the thon5and5: they
11011511011 like 111115. They kn0w nothing about 5:111it:11'y 1110:15111'115; they knew
nothing about how to manage the 1:11111111155a1'iat of t1111 army. They were utterly
'gno1ant in all 11111511 111111‘101'5'.. The l'nited State5 had been at peace 50 11.111.24—
tifteen or twenty v0:'11.5' 5111111 1110 period of the Me.\i :111 \'ar—that t110 I'nited
States .\1'111y. 0:011 thL1 51:111111111: a'rmy 111111-111 ed 111' We5t I'oint 1111111. knew p ':10-
tically little of the 115:1g 5 51111 experience5 of war time. .\ow. we an. obviate
:111 that hy giving t110 11000.5 ry amount of i115t1'u1t‘ion 111 our land-grant col-
leges. complying with the 1:11. . doing our duty in the 111atter, and 11111121111: 111
11:» (1.111511 of our 1'11111111'01111'1 ' t110 1110:1115 that :11'0 placed by the I'nited State5
(:11"1.11'11111111t: 1t our 111511115111 f. 1fl'111't1'11g tl1i5 end.

 

 J. K. I'A'r'runson, of Kentucky. I have a letter from Governor Willson, of.
Kentucky, who is very much interested in military education. He is the chair~
man of our board of trustees, and in that capacity I invited him to come to-
\".'ashington and be present at the deliberations of this body, but. he explains
to me in a letter that pressure of business at home prevented his coming. He
sent this letter, however, to me with the implied request that it be presented to
this body, and with your permission I will take occasion to do so:

My DEAR I’Rornsson I'A'I‘TlCRSON:

i regret very earnestly that I can not, be present at the meeting of the Land-
(lrant College Association to show my interest in their work and to learn more
or" it to help me be more useful in helping them, but my duties here will not let
me go.

ln view of the relaxation of military discipline in the State University of the.
juniors and seniors, I wished to urge upon the conference not only the duty but
the very great value of military discipline to our youth. It is a duty, because
the act of Congress of 18132, which made the allotment of public lands for these
colleges in section 4, expressly included "military tactics," clearly, to supple-
,n:ent lhe existing laws made to educate our people for military service, and espe-
cially to have otiicers ready in case of any need. It was a wise law. We can
not'h'ave too many of our young men instructed to be ready to serve their coun» ‘
try in case of need.

But it is even more valuable to our young men themselves. I can not tell
what I would give new if when I was in school and college I had had the great:
good of rigid military training; the setting-111) exercises, the lesson of power of
organization, training. discipline, obedience, and command; the lesson of duty to
our country and our laws, the stimulus of rivalry in learning that, lesson; and,
above all, the splendid upright, clear~eyed front»faced bearing and spirit of the
trained soldier-gentlennln. The lesson of implicit obedience must precede the
lesson of knowing how to lead or command. One must obey before he uses
authority, and no student in college is {lever old enough not to be blessed by this

-—"’TLT. ofif‘dfls Worth more than any one branch of study or education. One must
have a sound body and erect, gentlemanly bearing and carriage to half utilize
the best mental gifts. and I hope that the law will be made more strict, and that
all the colleges will anticipate the need of such a law and make their rules strict.
and without exception to any who is not physically crippled or disabled so as to
make it impossible. If we had hundreds of military schools, we should have
thousands ready to act as ollicers or highly intelligent soldiers in any use of
need; but that need is rather exceptional, and the main good of this training is
to send out thousands of splendid young men soldiers and gentlemen of splendid,
erect, and well-trained bearing, of young men taught that it, is just as indispen—
sable to obey as to connnand, with greater understamliug of the duties and
rcsponsibilties of life and of the great good of organization, t'aining, and
discipline. ,

If I were to decide for a son of my own or for myself, if I were again
young and had the knowledge I have now. I should dispense with any branch
of study before the military part, and I urge upon every one the practice of
insisting upon full, generous, and ample time being given to this military work
ol‘ these colleges. and I am sure that, the result will be an unmixed blessing
to every youth who has the training. a great uplifting and splendid example to
thousands who can not. get it, and a never-ending good and safeguard to our
country and our States.

 

 27 LL
swat .

their ultimate results and to run everything down to its ultimate analysis;
whatever his field of inves ation may or but \ery ottea he lacks constructive
scholarship, he lacks the power of constructive activity that makes his labor
effective. It has been said by the same 1‘e1'son that the aim of English educa-
tion is to make a gentleman. not a gentlenzan upon the basis of blood. but a gen-
tleman who ought to be representative of the old and the better nobility. and
embvdies all the citarmteristics that go to make up our modern conception of .1
gentleman—gentleness. generosity. manliness. The object of the English train-
ing is to do that. and they build upon the basis. mainly. of classical instruction.

'i‘wo centuries before public schools were established in England: two cen-
turies before public schools, either primary or secondary. were established upon
the continent of Europe. with the exception of some. parts of Germany. there
existed in Scotland what were called the "parochial" schools. and these
parochial schools made the men who enabled theircountry. out" of all proportion
to its ar 3a and its population, to dominate the civilization of t‘hristendom. It
was no uncommon thing for lnen to go up there from the parochial schools to
the University of Edinburgh or ot.‘ St. Andrew or Aberdeen. men who had no
training whatever except what they got in these parochial schools. and they
harried with them a very liberal amount of training: they carried with them
(‘icero and \'ergil and Horace and sometimes ’l‘acitus. They carried with them
not only the Greek "estament but the Anabasis and Homer. and they entered
these universities. and became the men who made Scotland what it is and what
it has been.

Shall we ruthlessly cut loose from all these t 'aditions and put aside classical
culture as of practically no value? My own impression is that whatever there
is opportunity and wherever there is :1 sutlicient‘ alndnnt of means‘at the com-'
mand of the parents. and where the boy or the girl manifests any disposition
to attain to a high grade of scholarship. we should give them the benefits
of classical training. at least as a basis upon which to build. It was said by
the same authority of which I spoke at the outset. that while the aim of the
(lerman is to make scholars in the merely technical sense 1 have spoken of,
while the aim of the I‘Jnglislnnan is to make gentlemen. that the aim of the.
American is. and should be. to make good citizens and the three ideals are not,
incompatible. The German has not the constructive ability that the liriton
has. although there has been a vitst amount of very great scholarship in Ger-
many, and although they have been unsurpassed in what they have obtained
in their Ialmratories with the crucible and the ll]l('1‘(lNC()]l(‘. yet Germany. so far
as i know. has never produced :1 Newton, never produced :1 Faraday. a Lord
Kelvin. or a Darwin. The men who are the leaders of thought. who have been
the leaders in molding the destinies of the world. have not been among the
Germans. great as is the intellect of the (lermans. and much as I honor it.
but it is the. men who Come from your grand old Saxon stock who have the
power to analyze into ultimate elements and then the power to build up and
construct again;

I think that we ought not to cut loose, ruthlessly from the classical system
of training our ancestors gave us, from the traditional ideals that we have
inherited. but that we ought to stick close by it. and that, So far as may be, we
ought: still to retain this as the best of all the instruction that we give.

- “R At 4.15 p. m. the section adjourned until Thursday, November 19, at 11) a. m.

 

 J. K. PATTERSON, of Kentucky. 1 have observed that the general consensus of
opinion is that amongr the list of our graduates who are present upon com-
mencement day those who have received somewhat of a classical training,
even though they graduate as engineers 0‘ as strictly scientific students, are.
able to express themselves with more ease and in more eloquent language,
their diction is superior, and they are able_t0 express themselves with a force
and vigor that does not attach to the young men or the young women who
have not had the previous advantage of some classical training. The head of
our engineering department informs me that he gets better results from those
who have taken two or three or four years in Latin and in Greek and in the
studies that appertain to the old curriculum than he does from those who have
not had the advantage of such training, and I believe that he is correct. It
seems to me that classical training gives a wealth of language and a elearness
of conception and an incisiveness of statement that is not obtainable by any
other preliminary course of training. 'ljhat has been my experience, and while
1 would not, insist upon a classical basis for the. majority of these courses of
study offered in our land-grant colleges, it seems to me that if the young man
and the young woman can afford the time and the means to take this pre-
liminary training it will inure to their advantage in the end.

Judged by results. 1 think I may safely say that we should not have had such
a nationality to-day if the men who founded the Republic had not been very
largely classically trained men. 1 think that the men who founded the com-
monwealth of Australia. the men who founded and governed the destinies of
the Dominion of t‘anada. the men who are now shaping the consolidation in
South Africa, would not be able to give to mankind the result that has been
obtained aml will be obtained but for the training of statesmanship that they

got upon a classical basis. It has been said of the Germans that their aim in
study is to make scholars. You all know the patient. persevering. investigating
character of the German student. 1-10 spares no time to follow out ideas to

 

  

 /4Q/7//M/M«@/ /5/ 44

mwf»; 5 //Ww£ ’ufl 2/ // U "J

V

.4

[/4424 (1.21.1 4 2: 212245 4
My

X" 7

««««« 43/ 24/221244 414/

[7

.. 2 rz/CK 4 2441/2?
VWflca—fl Q (/2752 @LWm/yfl //4374m7« % 27.,

4,424444/1744 .4 413%" /Cv@ ‘ [Zia/2 /W"“%"flg‘?
M/fl 2/4 /'?"W 7/, 2/4/74 I fiawfla
' %I% 4 1716/5326 139 ,

D‘A

2 4 24a: 2 {2441' at]; M24322,
uh ’ fiat/«ff :4” (fin/{7M

/5’Wl%flfl ”4424; 2/24 444/344,
24/ 37/444742 Z9 22444442225523,

Mffifl/Lr [4242/7

 

  

  

  

The Agricultural and Mechanical Col¥438 of Kentucky
wag matahlished in 1865, on the basin of the hand Grant
by congvena of 1862. In 1878 it was dgtached from ita 00n-
nention With Eentucky univernity, with whinh it wan orig}
uatly connected. In 1220 it was placed upon an tndapmn-
dent footing under the excluaive fianagament and control
of the State and a tax of one-half of one cent on every
hundrad dollars of taxable yrnperty wan levied by the
Lagiqlature far tin maintanance. In 1887 the Federal Govern-
ment established and partially endowed an Adrifiultural Ex
yu‘vrr‘lm'en‘t Station an: a hepm'tmertt 03" the Rmte College. The

State maanwhile pagned an act vegulating the Sale of ferte
ilimeru and veated the nanagemant theraof in the Expert-
ment 8,3tian of the College. The fmag aearuiA5 from tha
analynaa of fertilizers: ~50 into the treamu’y of the Uni-
vergity and are for the exaluaive uma of the expennnq and
:2:?1‘i.71?.€er1:17mfi2 Of the ‘rinqmzr‘il‘zr‘mt Station.

A committee aprointad annually by the Board

of Trugtaeg and known an the Board or Contwo1

.-, :un1agen

tha affairs of the Yxperiment Station. This Hoard of
ConfiTol Eng HQ 19321 exigtence under the charter but is
simply in the nature Of a committee appointed by the
Board is manage thfl affatfs of the Experiment Station in
the interval hwtwfifin maetings of the Ror*d of Truqteaa.
The mmxflflmentfmntunxhebu;a mfimrhvvn 0f1fim Agrvnu—
tuyal college of the fitata University, ia Heoeawarily a
yfirt of the Univargity, inagmuch 39 a part of a part ifi
a part of the whole. The Hoard of Trunteas of the Univer-
sity alonfl has pGWHr to appoint profegnorn and thloyeeg
and i0 fix the salary and coupenaatlon of each, provid—
ing the aanh malary for each and forbidding pmrquinitma
of any kind and under any pretext whatsoever. An adequate
salary $9 provided WV thm Board of Trustees for the Dirge-

1.0? 93‘? the Station fmdfoj'

50

.11 the firofenaorfl afid an:in-

tanfin who constitute hin ntaff. The whale ttma of the

 

  

.3

— (,1.

Director 19 duw to th~ surviae of the Station, jumt an
the 177-101;; H.776": 0-!) the profemmgma and :‘msgiqtmltn armoeiateri.
with him 3TH alno due to tha Station. The naiawv of fiho

Director of the Experiment fi.ntiLn 19 $1200. per annuu,

This qalary in equalled hy very few direetuTQ of Exneri-

-

”@311, 13;.Fit‘LO‘i-m in A‘rwriea, {171:1 is; mzrymratzed by only 1117:: or
three. The Leginlatuye flax vwfitmd the administration of
the P'in'fi Wood Law 1131 the D-i_;rwm’r,o;r- of the E$&3)r~er;‘i.;'n-e?lt Sta-
tion. 'rt in manifeut that whatever timw ha given in the
admtntatrntion of the Pure fined Lrw i9 taken out a? the
time due to thm genwral uerwice 0f the fiKflHTifiwflt fi.aticn
11nd when 7%. is oaeupied with ihm interefifig or iha Pure
Food Law, he in nut aenuptnd With any aihur nurflfifiefi 1n—
tnrnnt belonging in fifie S.afiion. ’fiwfl in £0 war file 3&-
miniutratton of‘the Pure Poad Law nakmq liaalm my me g4-

(i‘Ui'i_On.-71'?_ ctr-aft upon. {In-r. ’1‘. 12112. of!" the Dir'et‘nfier, I]; Fe?fi~z;2yv

at

of €519 ywar, at a Memting of thw Board of contra1

Whiih I Ham not yrmmen., the Roayd, upon the Relieitation

of 1,31»; Director. voter}. “.1qu 51 gratuity {if 9:130. gm? 2?}0fl‘hh

'3

out a; ihezfinvk;£

;_

weruifi»

1.)

M: the WXZ')t-f—.3‘f§.3’§*i3lt Stafiinn 731319?“
the Pure Wood Law, Thim I hold tha fisard 3f control find
N0 Fight to do, Far two reanonmz

Fir???” ‘Phr‘a‘. it was; 3101‘. within that? corapu’atm‘gny
to add 10 Q? tn dininifih thm congenmatisn a? th, Direc—
tor, but that thia wag within tum exclunivn compateney of
thw Board of TTHRtMHQ.

Remand. vhat thfi aomywnfiation of the Diractcr
was already adequate and ample, and that any additianal
compwnaation $0 the Director, when not mpecifioally prov}

dad for by the Legialaturm enacting the Pure Food Law
was in the nature of an unau horizéd gratuity. If‘hin
whola time he flua to the aarviee of the Station, it fol-
lowa that if that duty be varied but not appreciably in—
creased, that he 1a not entitléd to nxtra compensation fer

any variatinn in function that may he introduced. For a}

 

 maple, if my wholr- time ha mm in Hue _‘»;+'=::r~v%_ne on" the Wri—

V€'5.'I"‘-‘€ity WIGHT the striflm‘j! 5511’“?! 7.1314. 1:; (men not foliow tn”?

it I sa‘zmuld £33m a part 0:? that. time 1;} "Mm: K}!~_‘(“&}"L:3f~3 (J- +97%

Pug-+2 "Wood Law, that I wauld hr;- entit led to ruiditiomu em:-

3)r,~nrsrx?,ion, for £319 E’xfliij’Ymi mama that taming '1; mg." (91..

.‘ ,1 n n. ; w (_ ., v f ,w 4'). .u v. ,. ,‘ - ,. A“. .
Muycfl. main-.1 Nun'ia :zlsvlm' WK: r’zlrn‘w Tum: Lu», T. 01:32.70 291* .m

! ~v’

.1. , —-, .I. , .. .,. V» . ., -v.‘3 -
tub uwrix,:1.-~.yy a..0.r'}._ Q: the numbers: 1,1237 grape-:3“.

rn' .---.L~ an ,,.n."- _ A. .1», .. . _ . - A
-,:1€-> Vm‘wl 1L 1‘11 .: HGT. 14.7" Lat-r aus‘un—Jmat—1,031 :17 7C¢ils3d

U - .A's‘ w, _.». ' Ac- ,v.:..A ’ . ,. h- . —- . z - --

my mm 7;.0.1,.!'ri Cu mongrel L54 1,2; 31mg inn agreeing: czi;““:7gr_-
A. ,N "am . - a .n . ,3 .,._w.... w - ‘ . .. '- : . 4- ‘-

t".0211.5)”.911‘3v*hg.1,0n .101“ .1 fury?) =25“ 911.5; time. H7111»! 3, £5.13}? 1‘.» ‘ww

3.iw-equ-i_tah1e mm 73.71%?A?"i!’;‘a"‘i'5;tnr1 'Smt‘n in. 1:11.; and in ff'C'TJ’EAj,.."-’

 

 §_ u

TAYLOR & TAYLOR, "3

v" -

AND COUNSELLORS AT L_Aw,

I!
COLUMBUS, 0.. %@7 f” ‘ . $70 a

’ S

a ~ * WMMWLMJR

. m7 Mag-MW%¢WMW¢ W

. M affix-42;: 724% 22/ 7M tog/49:7 dam/a; .

JQML, A5 442% W_*W w‘a‘ 22$ m7 %

231Wf Wazfl W %/WMHZ
)9 fl