xt78sf2m7g9k https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dipstest/xt78sf2m7g9k/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station.  journals kaes_circulars_004_504 English Lexington : The Service, 1913-1958. Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Circular (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n. 504 text Circular (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n. 504   2014 true xt78sf2m7g9k section xt78sf2m7g9k   e*? in the fall run of slaughter hogs.
2

 _  i a
 y.   i
, T v
PERCENT OF 5EA$QN'$ ;1;i;t1$  
" V&RA Gi   IIIIIII  I
i
¤ I
 
 IIIIII IIIII li
110  
II III 11*
lis noo   [
se 1 y
  I IIIII  
ed 90  
K 1  
  IIIIIIIIII 1=
i S 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC   l
MONTH OF SEASON  
ini Average seasonal variation in prices of feeder pigs at live yi
ly- central Kentucky auction markets, 1926-48,  
ho T (Figure 1) y
!
ll€ Z 9 [
1 . .  
I Dollar importance of average seasonal price changes 1 S
For a year in which the market price of feeder
  pigs averaged $20 per 100 pounds, the seasonal
11» i Q variation in rice could make a difference of
> 1%% P
OE   up to $4 per 100 pounds received by the farmer,
On depending on the time he marketed his pigs.
op y
‘%€ Limitations in use of seasonal information about feeder I
lg PFICGS und marketings T  
In using information shown in the charts and  
in the discussion above, three points should be T g
kept in mind: A  
i
 » (1) Only the influences of seasonal forces upon r  
,ll€T , prices and marketings are shown. The
def effects of trends and cyclical influences are not  
;old considered. At times these forces may far outweigh the in- T i
hed fluence of the season in their effects upon prices and mar-  
ketings.  
T i
T S i
1 l
· . i

 ’ ty  g s
i I
li
I PERCENT" 0;: 1111111- ·
i SII EA$°" WI ““E¥ IMSIIIIIIII
 IIIIIIIII I
  IIIIIII   I
  IIIII
so
IIIIIIIIIII I
O JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
MONTH OF SEASON
- Average seasonal variation in marketings of feeder pigs at five
central Kentucky auction markets, 1927-48.
(Figure 2) ‘
 
(2) As an indication of seasonal tendencies in prices and market-
ings, the charts show averages for all feeder pigs over a 23-year
~ period, and prices in individual years may differ from this I
average. For example, seasonal prices for feeders averaged I
I highest in july, but were actually highest for the year in that
month in only IO years during the 23-year period. Averages.
however, do afford a basis for a better estimate as to when to
market shoats for highest prices in the season.
(3) ln arriving at a decision as to when to market feeder pigs. iu-
dications of seasonal tendencies in prices and marketingS
alone are not enough. These tendencies must be considered
· in the light of the producer's own estimates as to relative GOSH
of production for market at different months of the year.
Coc
A more detailed analysis of prices of feetltr
. pigs may be found in Bulletin 584, Mt
tacky Agricultural Experiment Station.
r l()?.l—G·li